Whilst one welcomes Dr Aseem Malhotra’s initiative in condemning the dispensing of Covid so-called vaccines and urging that the process is immediately suspended (Biznews, September 27), one wonders where he has been since other members of the medical profession raised red flags on the issue nearly two years ago.
In October 2020, 60,000 medical scientists and doctors endorsed the Great Barrington Declaration condemning lockdowns, mask-wearing and vaccines for the treatment of Covid-19. To date 932, 800 people have endorsed that Declaration which was authored by three very eminent medical scientists from three very eminent institutions: Dr Martin Kulldorff of Harvard, Dr Sunetra Gupta of Oxford and Dr Bhattacharya of Stanford.
How come Dr Malhotra did not come into contact with any of them and commence his mission against the so-called vaccines earlier?
In May 2021, Dr Peter McCullough, a renowned epidemiologist and cardiologist with 600 peer-reviewed articles to his credit, told the US Senate that dispensing vaccines for Covid was “too risky” as the trial periods had been insufficient. He recommended a further 30 months of trials because data on the side-effects of the drug – that’s what it is – were largely unknown.
In that connection, it does not say much for Dr Malhotra’s training that he went ahead and was doubled vaxxed in January 2021 despite the absence of long-term knowledge of the effects of the vax.
In any event, Dr McCullough backed up his concerns about the so-called vaccines by citing the statistics compiled by the CDC known as VAERS – vaccine adverse effects reporting system. Although known as a passive reporting system which captures only some 10% of actual adverse effects, for the period 14 December 2020 to 7 May 2021, there had been 190,000 reported cases of adverse effects and 4,057 deaths.
By August 2021 hospitals were noticing an unprecedented surge in myocarditis cases amongst 12 -17-year-olds. Worse still, in the highly vaxxed state of Israel, reinfections were rife by August 2021, occurring similarly in highly vaxxed UK and Singapore.
By August 2022, Germany’s largest health insurer, Techniker Krankencasse, reported that 1 in every 25 of its clients had had to undergo hospitalisation because of side effects following vaxxing. The UK Office of National Statistics reported that as of 6 July 2022, mortality rates per 100,000 people among the vaxxed exceeded those of the unvaxxed and that the gap was widening. In Australia, 90% vaxxed, 70% boosted, and death rates had increased by 10% compared to the pre-2021 period. In Israel, death rates are up 15%.
In August 2022, the CDC coyly began to walk back its stand on vaxxing by asserting that there should no longer be any discrimination between the vaxxed and the unvaxxed. [How fascinating, given the CDC’s previous stand that the unvaxxed would perish].
Significantly, the warnings of Dr Peter McCullough in May 2021 are borne out by the latest VAERS data up to 5 August 2022: Now 30,162 deaths from the vax have been recorded, 251,075 serious injuries out of a total of 1,379,438 adverse effects reports.
In January this year, Pfizer was compelled by a Federal Court in the US to disclose all its data on its so-called vaccine by August 2022. Previously, and incredibly, Pfizer had refused to do so and had specified the year 2096 by which time it would release that data. If Dr Malhotra had been following the dripping out of this data in the alternative media, he would long ago have realised how risky the contents of the vaccine drug is. For example, of 50 women subjected to the Pfizer jab, 22 of them suffered miscarriages as a result (44%).
This entire Covid-vax experience has been fraught with medical fraud driven by Big Pharma, complicit politicians and the media. It is well known that Big Pharma has made billions in profit from the vax campaign shamelessly propagated by governments worldwide – except in Peru and the state of Uttar Pradesh in India which treated Covid successfully with inexpensive ivermectin and or hydroxychloroquine.
1 Comment
Well said!
Malhotra has the knack of being behind, while seeming to lead. Perhaps he has a sixth sense of where media opinion is moving?
Add Comment