What Ivo Vegter of the Daily Friend terms “hypocritical platitudes” accurately sums up the case made by the jurists representing the South African government, not Christian South Africans. From the outset, by siding with the jihadist, genocidal Hamas zealots, the ideology of the SA team was writ large. It glossed over the unspeakable barbarism of the atrocities Hamas perpetrated on October 7. It ignores Hamas’ ideology of a single-state Palestine “from the river to the sea,” with the obliteration of Israel as the obvious intention and consequence.

Yet it charges Israel with genocidal intent. How does that square with Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza in 2005? Where is the genocide in Israel’s evacuation of 1,9 million Gazans? How is it that Hamas’ unremitting firing of rockets and bombs on civilian Israeli settlements is not recognised by the legal eagles as reflecting genocidal intent?

Calls for a ceasefire and peace ignore the context and circumstances prevailing. In the first place, Hamas has routinely violated ceasefires, which, in any case, it exploits as opportunities to regroup its terror squads. Secondly, to accept what the SA team is demanding would mean that Israel has to acquiesce and accept the bloody slaughter Hamas has wrought as the status quo. And what would result next, knowing Hamas’ intentions?

The willful blindness of the SA legal team in interpreting civilian casualties in Gaza as a result of Israel’s defence response as “genocide” is deplorable because it is totally one-sided. How is it that the October 7 atrocities perpetrated by Hamas are not termed “genocidal?”

The ultimate travesty of the ANC/SA government’s case is that it labels the victim of the Hamas barbarism as being guilty of genocidal intent.

The post Justice Exploited In Israel Case appeared first on Duncan Du Bois.

If he examined the World Economic Forum’s aims and policies, he would find that all the states experiencing turmoil are headed by WEF adherents. To bring about the WEF’s Great Re-Set goal of depopulated, Orwellian hemispheres presided over by an exclusive oligarchy, the first order of business is to eliminate national sovereignty.

The WEF’s key weapon to achieve that is through open borders and mass immigration. By imposing alien cultures on historically homogenous nations and cultures polarisation is inevitable. No self-respecting nation is going to tolerate its heritage and values being trashed by migrants to whom they have charitably provided asylum. That pushback is evident in the US, Italy, Germany, Holland, France, Britain, Denmark. Sweden.

In France two churches are vandalised, desecrated or torched daily. The same anti-Christian depredation occurs in Italy, Germany and Sweden. James Joyce’s city of Dublin resembles Minneapolis after a BLM riot.

In correctly stating that Donald Trump is “unbound by the conventional courtesies that grease the wheels of power,” it is a pity that Buccus does not apply his mind as to why Trump deviates from the WEF narrative to which Buccus loyally adheres. If he did so, he would find that Trump and his Maga movement are exposing and opposing the Deep State cabal that has been ruling America for 60 years. That WEF-aligned cabal, its kept press, bought politicians, Big Tech, Big Pharma and Ivy League adherents fear the loss of political control and the return of power to “We the people” as the US constitution ordains.

Buccus’s attempt to denigrate Trump with the badge “climate change denier” is actually a tribute. It shows that Trump recognises the historical and scientific reality that climate change is a natural phenomenon unrelated to human activities.

Two further claims by Buccus concerning Trump show how he allows his emotions and ideology to cloud his judgement. Trump’s travel ban applied only to states funding terrorism. In terms of safety and security,  it is perfectly logical and sensible to combat terrorism by isolating its source.  Based on that, for Buccus to accuse Trump of “Islamophobia” is nonsense. The same applies to his claim that Trump “bashes immigrants.” Like the majority of Americans, Trump opposes the madness of the WEF/Biden regime’s  policy of mass, illegal immigration and open borders.

Seeing as Buccus regards the policies of the WEF/Deep State as “progressive,” could he list just five ways in which America is better off under the WEF/Biden regime compared to Trump’s presidency?

The post Polarisation Is The Result Of The WEF’s Policies appeared first on Duncan Du Bois.