The Middle East is a cauldron of controversy, inflamed by atrocities on both sides. Charlie Kirk’s life and legacy amount to everything the Middle East does not reflect. That is the distinction that needs to be recognized, which is why, despite ungodly propaganda, millions worldwide are grieving at his death.

It is reflective of the fallen nature of this world that Charlie Kirk is branded as ‘controversial’ for striving to heal, teach and minister moral precepts of decency, forgiveness, love, compassion and truth.

Charlie Kirk sought to uplift and improve lives by emphasizing the timeless principles of righteousness found in the Bible. He did not harbour grievances towards those who mocked and verbally assailed him. He cherished and exemplified the right of free speech despite the barrage of abuse and opposition. He saw the good in humanity and sought to help the fallen from the error of their ways and thinking. He strove to mend and inspire relations, not to divide them.

Abraham Lincoln’s words in his second Inaugural Address aptly sum up Charlie Kirk’s pursuit of life: ‘With malice towards none and with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right…’

Consequently, the claim that outrage over Kirk’s murder constitutes double standards is grossly mistaken because the underlying issues between his life and Gaza are poles apart.

The post No Double Standards In Grieving For Charlie Kirk appeared first on Duncan Du Bois.

His death is the result of the subversion of morality and common sense propagated by educational institutions, the mass media and the Democratic Party. Charlie Kirk’s murder is the harvest of their lethal toxins of hate, which radicalized and poisoned the minds of many, like Kirk’s murderer, Tyler Robinson, who condemned Kirk as a “fascist” and a “Nazi”.

Therefore, it is not only hypocritical in the extreme for Democrats to accuse Charlie Kirk of provoking violence by debating the truth. It is blatantly un-American, un-Christian and uncivilized. But that is the campaign the Democrats and their media cohorts have relentlessly waged for a decade, demonising challenges to their narratives as “threats to democracy”.

Ramping up their hate rhetoric, they have persecuted and prosecuted conservatives as “domestic terrorists” and denounced the conservative movement as a greater threat than the 9/11 attacks in 2001. So demented have the Democrats become in the face of growing opposition to their illiberal, globalist, un-American policies that they are wittingly exhorting extremism.

This is exemplified by the following statement by Democrat Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut, screened by Laura Ingraham on Fox on September 12: “The only chance we have to save democracy is to fight fire with fire. We are in a war to save this country. You have to do whatever is necessary to do in order to save the country.”

Besides the reality that it is the Republican Party which is saving America from the destruction of its foundations by the Democrats’ policy of open borders, cancel culture, globalism and wokeism, the clear implication of Senator Murphy’s words is that assassination is in order.

Charlie Kirk noted that in his broadcast of April 7, 2025, when he cited a survey which found 50% of those who called themselves ‘liberal’ believed that the assassination of Elon Musk or Trump would be “somewhat justified”. Yet despite the incisive rhetoric of top Democrats, Nancy Pelosi has insisted “we cannot take responsibility” for political violence.

Vitriolic MSNBC commentator Matthew Dowd, who has been fired for his comments on Kirk’s murder, claimed Kirk’s “hate speech contributed to his death.” Like Pelosi, he shifts responsibility from the perpetrator to the victim, which then contrives a scapegoating situation in which violence is rationalised.

The worldwide outpouring of grief and anger at the senseless murder of Charlie Kirk is an uplifting and positive indication of the contempt and revulsion of millions for the ungodly politics of the Left and the Democratic Party. Ironically, in death, Charlie’s Turning Point movement is poised to surge to new heights, championed by the courage, determination and God-fearing spirit of his widow.

Equally significant, Charlie Kirk’s death has initiated another turning point for liberty: the denouement of the evil of the totalitarian Left.

The post The Significance of Charlie Kirk’s Death for Liberty appeared first on Duncan Du Bois.